In the case of many students at IGNOU and IGNOU, the study of literature can be the most confusing element of the project. This is particularly true for students working on IGNOU’s mcom projects, where academic depth is expected, but the guidance isn’t as clear. Students typically ask if they need to summarize books, make journal articles more readable, or simply gather quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project.
Literature reviews are not a report of how much material you have read. It’s written to demonstrate how well you comprehend the prior work on the topic you’re researching and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link ideas with research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before beginning any writing, it is vital to understand the reason this chapter is essential to an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three main purposes.
In the first place, it indicates that the subject you have chosen has been extensively studied and has a scholarly significance. Additionally, it can help you identify any gaps or limitations from earlier research. Third, it provides a base for your research goals and the methodology.
Many students see this chapter as a formality and duplicate content from previous projects or even from online sources. This usually leads to the project being rejected or not getting marks. IGNOU will require original content even when examining existing studies.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. The same time those who write merely to explain their ideas are as well discouraged. For an ignou master’s degree project, the review of literature will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.
It is expected that you read research papers, books report, journals, and sometimes government publications related with your field. The attention should be focused on studies which are directly related to your area of study.
As an example, if the project focuses on the performance of financials of banks If so, your literature analysis should include earlier studies about financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk assessment.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
One common mistake students make is deciding to use too many disparate sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. In the case of an ignou MCOM project, around fifteen to twenty sturdy sources is usually sufficient should they be selected carefully.
Good sources include academic journals highly regarded books by well-known authors, RBI papers, official reports as well as university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.
It is always best to choose recent studies, ideally from the last ten years. Studies from the past can be considered in the event that they are fundamental in the nature.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized section improves understanding and perception. Instead of composing short summaries that are not organized, divide your literature reviews into clear sections.
You can organize the chapter in accordance with themes, time period techniques, methodologies, or variables investigated. For example, one section may cover studies related the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, while another focused on the efficiency of operations.
This structure can help evaluators realize that you’re not copying content, but rather analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The writing style should be simple but academic. Avoid using a lot of words and terminology. IGNOU MCOM project help (ladaonline.ru) is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.
The study you are discussing should include the author name, the year of study, the methodological objective, most important results. However, do not list them chronologically. Make an effort to link one study to another.
When you’ve discussed your findings from one study, describe how another researcher supported or contradicted those findings. This comparative approach adds depth to your ignou mcom project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
One frequent error is writing the literature review in the form of it is a textbook chapter. Explaining basic concepts such as what accounting is and the meaning of management is not appropriate in this article unless they are directly linked to previous studies.
Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written by you in the style of your personal words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while the copying of your review shows dependency.
Many students do not connect sources to their own research focus. Every research you present should have a clear connection the goals of your project.
Linking Literature Review with Research Gap
One of most important results of the examination of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU assessors require you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or if further research is required.
After discussing multiple studies, it’s possible that studies were focused on large businesses as small businesses were overlooked. In the past, studies utilized secondary data, but the primary data was limited.
This is a reason for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your project could seem repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
While writing the review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally supports APA style, but consistency is more important than perfect.
Each study that is discussed should be included in the reference list at the end of the project. References that are not included raise doubts about authenticity.
Avoid footnotes when reviewing literature. The in-text citation is better and looks more professional in an ignou mcom project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students often ask how long the length of their review on literature ought to last. There is no fixed rule but, for an ignou assignment in mcom, this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents -two thousand words.
The length should depend on the complexity of the topic. A larger topic demands more studies, while a focused topic needs fewer but more in-depth discussions.
The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analyses does not increase marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing as this
Author A did a thorough study of banking’s performance and obtained good results
Write in this manner
Write as this: Author A conducted a study of banking performance by using financial ratios. The study concluded that profitability increased because of better asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B who stressed the role played by operational efficiency in increasing bank earnings.
This type of approach shows understanding and analysis, which is highly valued in an mcom project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get stopped or rejected because of copy-pasted literature reviews. Even if the reference is to previous studies, the terminology needs to reflect your unique style.
Utilize plagiarism checking tools when feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is superior to copied perfection.
Final Review Before Submission
Before submitting your ignou-mcom project, make sure you read the entire literature review. Review each article to determine if it is relevant, if your flow follows logically and whether the chapters naturally connect to your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear the reasons for my research. If yes then you’re on the correct track.
Closing Thoughts
Writing a literature review for an ignou mcom project might be difficult at first in particular for students who are returning to school after a break. But once you recognize that it’s about analysis and connections rather that memorization, the work is manageable.
Make time to read, think, and write with your own voice. It is reflected clearly on your final product and frequently makes the difference between an average project and a high-quality one.